首页> 外文OA文献 >Global ionospheric and thermospheric response to the 5 April 2010 geomagnetic storm: An integrated data-model investigation
【2h】

Global ionospheric and thermospheric response to the 5 April 2010 geomagnetic storm: An integrated data-model investigation

机译:全球电离层和热层对2010年4月5日地磁风暴的响应:综合数据模型研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We present a case study of the 5 April 2010 geomagnetic storm using observations and numerical simulations. The event was driven by a fast-moving coronal mass ejection and despite being a moderate storm with a minimum Dst near ?50 nT, the event exhibited elevated thermospheric density and surges of traveling atmospheric disturbances (TADs) more typically seen during major storms. The Thermosphere-Ionosphere-Mesosphere-Electrodynamics General Circulation Model (TIMEGCM) was used to assess how these features were generated and developed during the storm. The model simulations gave rise to TADs that were highly nonuniform with strong latitude and longitude/local time dependence. The TAD phase speeds ranged from 640?m/s to 780?m/s at 400?km and were ~5% lower at 300?km and approximately 10–15% lower at 200?km. In the lower thermosphere around 100?km, the TAD signatures were nearly unrecognizable due to much stronger influence of upward propagating atmospheric tides. The thermosphere simulation results were compared to observations available from the Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE), CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites. Comparison with GOCE data shows that the TIMEGCM reproduced the cross-track winds over the polar region very well. The model-data comparison also revealed some differences, specifically, the simulations underestimated neutral mass density in the upper thermosphere above ~300?km and overestimated the storm recovery tome by 6 h. These discrepancies indicate that some heating or circulation dynamics and potentially cooling processes are not fully represented in the simulations, and also that updates to some parameterization schemes in the TIMEGCM are warranted.
机译:我们使用观察和数值模拟方法对2010年4月5日的地磁风暴进行了案例研究。该事件是由快速移动的日冕物质抛射驱动的,尽管是中等风暴,最小Dst约为50 nT,但该事件表现出更高的热圈密度和更常见于大风暴中的行进大气扰动(TAD)激增。热球-电离层-中层-电动力学通用循环模型(TIMEGCM)用于评估暴风雨期间这些特征的产生和发展方式。模型仿真产生了高度不均匀,高度纬度和经度/本地时间相关性的TAD。 TAD相速度在400?km时范围为640?m / s至780?m / s,在300?km时降低约5%,在200?km时降低约10-15%。在大约100公里的低热层中,由于向上传播的大气潮汐的影响更大,因此TAD信号几乎无法识别。将热层模拟结果与重力场和稳态海洋环流探测器(GOCE),挑战微型卫星有效载荷(CHAMP)以及重力恢复与气候实验(GRACE)卫星的观测值进行了比较。与GOCE数据的比较表明,TIMEGCM很好地再现了极地上的横走风。模型数据的比较还显示出一些差异,具体而言,模拟低估了〜300?km以上的上热层中性质量密度,并高估了风暴恢复书本6 h。这些差异表明,在模拟中并未完全体现出某些加热或循环动力学以及潜在的冷却过程,而且还需要对TIMEGCM中的某些参数化方案进行更新。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号